Gabrielle, Michael, and Raphael
By Steve Beckow, January 27, 2022
(Golden Age of Gaia)
How Many Archangels Are There? – Part 1/2
I’m writing an article (1) on our work as lightworkers – but as angels as well. Or rather as angelics, according to Archangel Michael.
I was writing it to remind us at this critical time of who is here – that is, us angelics. Angelics, evidently, takes in all orders of angels.
I was discussing the seraphim with him when, as an aside, he made a statement about the archangels that had me catch my breath.
I wanted to include that discussion in the article I was writing and realized (2) that it should go in a separate piece.
It isn’t related to the turmoil. It is related to the angelics; that is, us.
It illustrates the situation with our knowledge of them … errr, us.
We know next to nothing about them – nothing reliable, that is. In one reading, Michael shredded the Biblical account of nine hierarchical orders. You’ve seen how he’s expanded classical enlightenment accounts. (3)
I have no idea how large the classes of beings are, as what follows demonstrates. I’m ignorant of them, eevn though they play a pivotal role in human history.
Nothing I know qualifies me from my contact with Michael, thanks to Linda, to say anything at all. I refuse to play the role of an expert, really, on any subject, but especially one like this.
Knowledge of them remains a thousand-piece puzzle. In all the readings I’ve had with Michael, there may be ten more pieces of substantive knowledge about the various orders, that we talked about. (4) That’s all.
So here is one piece of that puzzle. How many archangels do you think there are? And is that a relevant question?
Archangel Michael in a personal reading with Steve Beckow through Linda Dillon, Aug. 5, 2020.
Steve: How many archangels are there?
Archangel Michael: You want an actual number? Because do not forget that we are known by many names.
Steve: … A ballpark number?
AAM: Yes, a ballpark would be 144.
Steve: No! Is that all?
AAM: Do you underestimate our abilities, dear heart?
[They’re called “the Mighty Ones,” after all. Dare I ruffle the feathers of an Archangel?] (4)
Steve: No, but I thought there were thousands if not millions of you.
AAM: No.
Steve: Well, I’ll be. It will probably take me a month to assimilate that.
(Concluded in Part 2, below.)
Footnotes
(1) “How Many Archangels Are There? – Part 1/2,” January 20, 2022, at https://goldenageofgaia.com/?p=331263.
(2) A minor realization but a realization nonetheless. I can’t pass by the opportunity to mention: Realization or realized knowledge falls on a spectrum from minor to major. Enlightenment is a major realization. An “Aha!” is a minor.
(3) Steve Beckow: It’s very different from classical theory.
Archangel Michael: Classical theory has served you well. Now you are on a new course. (Archangel Michael in a personal reading with Steve Beckow through Linda Dillon, Feb. 20, 2018.)
(4) An example would be an aside he made about the Dominions once and how they were helping corporations become more ethical. (And they have their work cut out for them, I say.)
But this is an example of a substantive piece of knowledge in the thousand-piece puzzle. It also shows how few reliable pieces we have.
“Substantive” refers to the domain of spiritual knowledge, which includes but is not limited to the domain of empirical-materialist knowledge.
(4) Steve Beckow: Are you okay with the four-part article on ignition?
Archangel Michael: Yes.
Steve: Okay. I didn’t know if I was being too familiar.
AAM: You know what? We want you to be familiar.
Steve: Okay, I get that. Thank you. (Ibid., Jan. 3, 2017.)
On the two occasions I’ve seen him, AA Michael looked most like Keanu Reeves with a ponytail
By Steve Beckow, January 27, 2022
(Golden Age of Gaia)
How Many Archangels Are There? – Part 2/2
(Concluded from Part 1, above.)
Archangel Michael in a personal reading with Steve Beckow through Linda Dillon, Sept. 16, 2020.
Steve: Now you have said there are 144 archangels. And yet on another occasion you mentioned that there were billions of those sparks of lights being birthed to this day.
And I asked you, were you talking about the Seraphim or all the angels and you said you were talking about all the angels if you take it as a very large group. (1)
So am I correct in thinking that the archangels are not a very large group but angels themselves, or I guess angelics, are?
AAM: Yes and no. So now I’m going to tease you because you have this expression upon the planet (I’ve already had this conversation with the channel [Linda Dillon] and she has been shaking her head as well so it is an answer for both of you), you have this expression upon the planet of, “how many angels are dancing on the head of a pin?” And yes, there is an infinite number. So think of that.
Now, when I have said (and I have said it calmly but incompletely) there are 144 of us in what you would think of as the archangelic realm, for example, each of us would have, not just a thousand but 100,000 expressions of how we can be known and manifest throughout the Omniverse.
So what you are doing, Dear Heart, is trying to count us the way that you would count heads on a bus. It does not work that way! So our numbers are small and our number is massive.
If you’re like me, hearing this information from one who knows, shall we say, is transformational. This is one of only a few comments Michael has made about the archangelic kingdom. It gives me the ability to at least apply a number to them when I try to visualize them.
It allows me to visualize them, say, as a tree, with roots going out everywhere.
The more detail I have, the clearer I’m able to reach out from my position and extend my conscious connection in their direction. I assume that when the timing is right they will deign (because I’d be a lucky scoundrel) to complete the connection.
I say this based on experiences where Archangel Michael and the Mother have said that they’ve shaped experiences of mine and determined their timing.
As a result of that, I believe that enlightenment rests in the hands of the angelics and galactics, embodied and disembodied, acting as agents of the Divine Mother. (2)
As I look at this and consider the turmoil that lies ahead, it occurs to me that it may be useful to remind us of our existence as angelics. I’ll post one or two more articles on it, to remind us of who we are and who is here.
Let the deep state not aggravate us too much. (Joke.)
Footnotes
(1) Archangel Michael: This is something that we have never really talked about before, in the Mother’s infinite creation there are still billions of those sparks of light being birthed to this day.
Steve Beckow: And these were the seraphims or all of the angels?
AAM: No, all the angelics, if you take it as a very large group. (“Archangel Michael on the Angelic Kingdom (Repost),” Aug. 11, 2017, at http://goldenageofgaia.com/2017/08/11/archangel-michael-on-the-angelic-kingdom-repost/.)
(2) Take as well the case of Isaiah:
In the year that king Uzziah died I saw also the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up, and his train filled the temple … and one [seraphim] cried unto another, and said, Holy, holy, holy, is the Lord of hosts: the whole earth is full of his glory.
… Then said I, Woe is me! for I am undone; because I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips: for mine eyes have seen the King, the Lord of hosts.
Then flew one of the seraphims unto me, having a live coal in his hand, which he had taken with the tongs from off the altar:
And he laid it upon my mouth, and said, Lo, this hath touched thy lips; and thine iniquity is taken away, and thy sin purged.
Also I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, Whom shall I send, and who will go for us? Then said I, Here am I; send me. (Isaiah 6:1 + 5-9.)
Or Tobias:
The angel … told Tobias (1) that, after the third night had come to an end, he would be joined to his bride in the fear of the Lord. Now when the fear of God is perfect, love is also perfect, and love is perfect when the transformation of the soul in God is achieved. (St. John of the Cross in Kieran Kavanaugh and Otilio Rodriguez, trans. Complete Works of St. John of the Cross. Washington: Institute of Carmelite Studies, 1973, 75.)
Or Mohammed:
By the declining, star, your compatriot is not in error, nor is he deceived!
He does not speak out of his own fancy. This is an inspired revelation. He is taught by one who is powerful and mighty [Gabriel].
He stood on the uppermost horizon; then, drawing near, he came down within two bows’ length or even closer, and revealed to his servant that which he revealed.
His own heart did not deny his vision. How can you, then, question what he sees?
He beheld him once again at the sidrah-tree, beyond which no one may pass. (Near it is the Garden of Repose.) (Koran, 112.)